Unlock the “cold-case” secrets of the origin of life in just 14 minutes as Detective J. Warner Wallace shows why unguided physics and chemistry can’t explain DNA, information, and the first living cell.
For more information, read God’s Crime Scene: A Cold-Case Detective Examines the Evidence for a Divinely Created Universe (http://amzn.to/2kAroVD)
ALSO:
Can Naturalists Explain Where Life Originated?
https://coldcasechristianity.com/writings/can-naturalists-explain-where-life-originated/
source
39 Comments
@jeremytibbs13
I've watched several videos of my brother in Christ and he has very powerful messages to share.
@richardblakbary2245
Why Can’t The Who be Aliens? There is proof of extraterrestrial life.
@RandyMovold
How does one find the whole video, and not just this short clip?
@lolcakes
For me, as someone who studies biology rigorously, I just can't see how life can come to exist without something transcendent and bigger than us, and possibly the universe. No molecule can become/create life/consciousness and it perplexes me why this isn't brought up more. I consider myself an agnostic very heavily leaning towards Christianity, and everyday I get drawn even further towards theism, not out of emotion but out of pure reason. Whether Christianity is the truth is debatable and I shall seek truth honestly and hopefully with no internal bias since I already consider Christianity the truth (sorta), but the question of a creator or at the very least something bigger than us is to me confirmed. Either we're basically apes and are unable to comprehend life, or perhaps something/someone bigger exists, and that something/someone not only created us but seeks a relationship with us. I hope everyday for a different answer, but if either were indeed true, it would shatter my worldview entirely. On one hand, I yearn for a personal relationship with God, the literal creator of the world. On the other hand, this would strike the sharpest of fears in me, because if God is real, and Christ is King, I have been sinning for too long with no remorse or guilt, and I along with many others may die without accepting the free gift of salvation, and be cast to a Godless eternity, devoid of love and anything Godly for that matter. It scares me to death sometimes because the logical conclusion I come to is God probably does exist, yet I don't live like it. At the end of the day who knows haha.
@DeshiEsther-ps2op
Please can we get a video defending miracles please
@nickj3287
Humans think they are older and more wise than life,
What I learnt about oxygen, from studying a little but about corrosion,
In out atmosphere we have oxygen, but did you know on the edge of our atmosphere, these oxygen atoms at not the same, they are atomic oxygen and can not bind together because of the cosmic particles in space that keeps passing through them.
So actually life is a very long process, and proteins need a atmosphere, to interact and become complex,
The most abundant elements in space are cosmic or atomic elements… hydrogen helium.
Although I'm not a expert curiously I sometimes read..
And to my understanding the universe is very intelligent,
@beadoll8025
Most atheists reject the moral law that God put in place, so they reject Him. Basically, people just want to whore around and sin with no accountability…that's all.
@johnnyatoms3620
Perception in utterance, is the foundation of every language in expression and experience, bringing discretion, becoming understanding, which is expressed as council and truth, in relationship between others like yourself, in reproduction.
Flesh and blood, is but the carbon copy of perception, in utterance itself !
Enstien's E = Mc2….
@allenbrininstool7558
Scientists are not close to origin of life at all. I’m finding most Atheists are very ignorant these days
@christtheway-n3o
I Will share this with all my “ smart” atheists friends. 👑
@JRTIGER07
Another Great book to read is " The Case for Christ" by Lee Strobel (atheist investigator Journalist turned Christian) The Movie ok as well 🙏
@huh2275
Is Genesis History? – Full free film (Bible presented from a scientific perspective, including geology, genetics, and dinosaur jerky)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UM82qxxskZE
@teluvv66
I love this brother's factual non-religious unbiased explanation of reasoning. There is only so far you can go with the truth! Praise God for this man and his ministry!
@dmcgwhisper5945
Excellent!
@AnimasiKanasia
Very informative!
@JoelGrant-ie4ly
God is merciful to the unbeliever by providing Christian men and women who understand the science behind Creation and who faithfully present it. The unbelieving scientist/educator/engineer/philosopher/Etc.will have no excuse when they stand before God.
@imbatman3620
Another excellent Resource book – "Darwinism under the microscope" by author James P. Gills M.D.
@imbatman3620
ROMANS 1:19since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them.1:20For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities–his eternal power and divine nature–have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. 🙌🙏
@philipcallicoat3147
God's Word is very much ALIVE. !!!!
He breaths stars!
He loves His Creation.He loves you and I…..He mustn't be disobeyed…Yet everyone from Adam is a born sinner… The remedy for our sins? The Blood Jesus Christ shed on the Cross.Please, please believe that 🙏☝️✝️🕊️
@redeemedfromsin
where's the full video?
@shipwright6122
Our Creator is axiomatic by the things that He has made. 🙏🏼✝️
@hectorhernandez215
Some Real intelligent atheists later change to real apologetics christians….
@DivineKnight_115
Our God truly is great and good to create life and give us choice. We may not make the right ones but it’s important that we recognize the gift of being allowed to make it.
@ianscottcastillo7709
Is there a full version of this?
@ADF366
Is this amazing guy Dr Drew's brother?
@CDGMR1
Thank you! Great video.
@moeman777
I've watched this a few times now to properly understand and it and use it at school. Thank you so much, Jim Warner Wallace!
…
Q: So what are the building blocks of life?
A: Proteins
Q: Where do proteins come from?
A: Ribosomes.
Q: Oh great, so where do ribosomes come from?
A: Made out of proteins 👍
🧐😂
….Q: So where'd all this lego come from?
A: A lego making machine
Q: What's the lego making machine made out of?
A: Lego
Oh, then someone must have designed and built the lego machine to begin with 👍
@defectoamarsins3539
The hardest part for me to become a hardcore atheist were these question🥲 I mean sure I could deny and be ignorant and say there is no God! But I knew within me that couldn’t be true.
PS: after years of being an agnostic I’m now a Christian
@lovegodselfandneighbor421
Like a highly skilled school teacher, Jim Wallace has applied the educational principle of introducing simple to complex concepts, in simple words and illustrations which can be grasped by almost everybody, whatever the level of education. Also, thank you for introducing us to the work of Dr. Werner Gitt. Very helpful to know more scientists who can explain the existence of a Creator from an academic-INTELLECTUAL perspective, rather than from Scriptures alone. I AM more learned now, from 15mins ago!
@leahhathaway2796
Incredible! God bless you
@TheIgnoredGender
It's the same thing as when does life begin in the womb. Some Pro-choicers will say life begins at some arbitrary point in time but disagree as to when (could be a couple weeks, months, 2nd or 3rd trimester, or even until birth) others will say it's not a life until a certain event occurs (not until brain activity, not until a heart beat, etc…). But the only consistent and logical thing is to say it begins at conception.
@renierramirez9534
God revelation to humanity:
Natural ( universe)
Special ( the Bible )
Personal (Jesus)
Enough?
Nope.
People use arguments against God's existence
Rational (They don't " see" evidence)
Emotional (Arguments based on moral questions)
Volitional ( don't want to despise of evidence)
Volitional
@anonymousanimal1534
I can see the atheist naturalist's response to the "levels of information" demonstration.
In the beginning there was the line of gibberish. However, over billions or trillions of generations of varying organisms that sprang from the beginning, the process of natural selection determines whether a mutation is able to carry on to the next generation or not. There are still mutations that are considered defects, however, since they are errors overlooked by the natural selection process that let these traits off the hook. This, ladies and gentlemen, is the "blind watchmaker" or the "blind architect" or the "blind painter". It is an unconscious guide hand. Many boeing 747s and wrist watches contain flaws and defects, which means that evolution of genetic sequences was not directed by a perfect hand or an intelligent being with a perfectionist intention.
Now, the atheist naturalist has provided an alternative explanation as a challenge to ID, at least for the natural selection history of complex organisms. This implies that the telelogical assumption of a perfect, conscious watchmaker made by many ID advocates might not be true, or might be at least partially incorrect. However, he has not eradicated the room for faith. Here's why.
The foundation of scientific research, especially for molecular biology and physics, rely on a collection of observed laws that serve as permanent, dogmatic principles. For example, how does one prove empirically that the laws of Newton will uphold forever? Advocates of scientism might say well, it has upheld as far as we know it, so we logically assume that it will keep holding up until the end of time. I would say that this "proof" also sits on the presupposition which is the unique human way of observing time, and secondly, what determined these laws of physics, and why? How is it enforced? Does the watchmaker remain blind in this context? The same questions can be applied to the "central dogma" of molecular biology and many others of the field, or at least parts of these processes or rules. They can also be asked about the laws of time.
The complicated conditions that sometimes imperfectly judges whether an organism is worthy of passing down its genome or not are, at their core, a build up from a set of assumed natural laws. For those that have a prior empirical observation as proof, the rabbit hole still descends to dogmatic presuppositions, whethet physical or biological, that form the basis of our understanding. They are like a set of mother graphs, and the blind watchmaker sets and enforces the standard is one of their complex but unsymmetrical or imperfect transformations.
Science, after all, is the study of empirical observations. One observation can prove another, but after going down the rabbit hole regarding the question of causation, we are left with a collection of logical axioms that serve as the basis of how we understand the material world, and subsequently a collection of dogmatic principles that are assumed to hold up all time, space, and matter in the universe permanently as we know it. The ultimate upholder of this set of permanent laws is a higher power, who equipped us with a set of logical axioms that enables us to have the potential to understand the world, and free will for us to be conscious about our own logical axioms.
On a side note, the blind watchmaker still fails to provide a valid alternative explanation for the chicken and egg questions regarding the causation origins of RNA, DNA, ribosome, proteins, etc that was presented in the first part of the lecture clip.
@stevenlane6795
You are the greatest testimony to God a modern day Paul
@matthewaustin9790
"Dear God,
I know I’m a sinner, and I ask for your forgiveness. I believe Jesus Christ is Your Son. I believe that He died for my sin and that you raised Him to life. I want to trust Him as my Savior and follow Him as Lord, from this day forward. Guide my life and help me to do your will. I pray this in the name of Jesus. Amen."
Did you pray this prayer?
@samueldiaz1987
Great video!!!
@peruseperusing5027
In the beginning…… GOD!!!! And if you don't like that… too bad! So sad. 🙂
@johnberbatis7031
At the beginning of the universe, the Natural Laws of Science came into being, without those Laws there would be no universe. A mere chance or intelligent design? How could time flow into the future universally without an omnipresent and omnipotent influence? Max Planck (Won the 1918 Nobel Prize in Physics )made many contributions to physics but is best known for quantum theory, which revolutionized our understanding of the atomic and sub-atomic worlds. In his 1937 lecture "Religion and Naturwissenschaft," Planck expressed the view that God is everywhere present. —- Before matter could form space-time had to be stabilized and uniform while it simultaneously flowed into the future throughout the universe. Far too complex to be a product of random acts, but only about Intelligent Design.
@jackyluo
Man's spitting facts. Great video!